Iron Sky: The Coming Race


Action / Adventure / Comedy / Sci-Fi

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 29%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 31%
IMDb Rating 5 10 8026


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
June 06, 2019 at 11:12 AM


Julia Dietze as Renate Richter
Tom Green as Donald
Udo Kier as Wolfgang Kortzfleisch
Emily Atack as Tyler
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU 720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
803.24 MB
English 2.0
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
P/S 3 / 34
1.5 GB
English 2.0
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
P/S 3 / 22
796.77 MB
English 2.0
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
P/S 3 / 47
1.49 GB
English 2.0
23.976 fps
1 hr 33 min
P/S 2 / 49

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by avadams 6 / 10

Not perfect, but better than Sharknado (any of them).

I didn't expect much from a sequel to a movie about Moon Nazis, but they really pulled out the stops on this one. The first movie had a lot of dull moments with interesting, if campy, scenarios that made it a watchable film (but not memorable). This time around, the acting, environments, special effects and music all got much needed upgrades. With the exception of a needless subplot, I had fun with this and I didn't feel my eyes roll back even once in annoyance. It isn't a stellar movie, but it blows the doors off of any budget title or SyFy dross.

Reviewed by helloamazon 3 / 10

Huge Disappointment - the first Iron Sky movie was much better with a smaller budget

I loved Iron Sky 1 for what it was, a good SF B-Movie with some very sarcastic and even intelligent political in-jokes.

The sequel is a big disappointment unfortunately (and, to reiterate, I write this as someone who loves B-movies and I even donated some money for this sequel):

  • Weak plot and no credible bad guy. "Jokes" that simply don't work or are tired ("jailbroken" iPhones in 2019?), coupled with wooden acting. However, I don't think the actors are to blame a lot given the weak script and plot they had to work with.

  • The special effects are not much better than in the first movie, where did all the budget (around 3X the amount of the first movie, 20+ million versus 7-8 million!) end up? For example, the director asked for extra crowdfunding money for some additional "Vril" kill scenes that add next to nothing in the final version.

  • Weak communication with funders, credibility broken or lost. "Normal" moviegoers get to see the sequel weeks or months in advance - and since the movie leaked out to the usual Internet sites, there was and is no sound logic in NOT providing a digital copy (or at least a stream) to backers who funded this in good faith many years ago.

(The movie ended up in development hell because of legal troubles with the FX team from the first movie concerning intellectual property, I will spare you the boring details. This results in more of the jokes and puns that COULD have worked a few years ago now being outdated as of 2019.).

Recommendation for a third Iron Sky movie (which is at least hinted at at the end of the movie): Get a better script writer, get a better script writer. Did I mention to get a better script writer? And maybe a new director as well.

Reviewed by veinctor 5 / 10

Barely decent

The original Iron Sky was way better and I was a big fan of that amazing movie. Sadly, after all this waiting, the sequel is not so good.

The plot is bad (half the time I didn't know what the characters are trying to do or find or why), the effects are fine I guess (I love the spaceship scenes) and the jokes are weird and miss most of the time.

It's not a spoiler to tell you what is missing. Yes, the trailers were misleading to a certain degree. There is no Jesus, Putin is there just to dance and half of the scenes in the trailer are not in the movie. The characters have weak or no motivation at all and most of the things that happen seem convenient for the plot.

The movie just exists to exist. It serves no purpose. I only recommend it for the fans of the 1st movie and my suggestion is to rewatch Iron Sky 1 instead of this flick. That said, the very ending was brilliant!

Read more IMDb reviews


Be the first to leave a comment